Skip to content

Explore by subject

Global Payments

Choose the country and rail for your customer, then check acceptance, settlement and cross-border requirements in the relevant market guide.

Briefings, grouped by decision

61 briefings in Global Payments

Asia-Pacific

Market guides and ecosystem analysis across Asia — from UPI at scale to SEA super-apps and wallet wars.

SWIFT and ISO 20022 messaging reference

The SWIFT correspondent chain and its ISO 20022 CBPR+ migration — field-by-field message mapping, investigation and recall messages, account reporting, and payment initiation status.

PSP and provider comparisons

Operator-facing decision frameworks for choosing between PSPs, acquirers, and payment method providers. Archetype-driven, not feature checklists.

Other briefings in this topic

Stack map

The market entry payment decision layers

Check these dimensions against the target customer, transaction type and provider route you can actually use.

  1. 01

    Rail landscape

    Which rails serve your customer segment, and who operates them?

  2. 02

    Regulatory model

    Check the operating model, oversight, access conditions and applicable pricing rules.

  3. 03

    Acceptance economics

    Compare acceptance fees, conversion costs and settlement terms for the intended use case.

  4. 04

    Integration path

    Direct API to the rail, local acquirer required, or aggregator sufficient?

  5. 05

    Cross-border settlement

    Can money leave via the local rail, or does it require SWIFT or a bilateral linkage?

  6. 06

    Consumer context

    Mobile-first, card-habituated, or cash-to-digital — determines which product assumption survives the market.

Reference

Frequently asked

What is a real-time payment rail and how does it differ from a card network?

A real-time payment rail moves money between accounts quickly, often around the clock — examples include UPI, Pix, PayNow and Faster Payments. It differs from a card network in initiation, access and dispute processes. Merchant prices are not uniformly zero: Pix merchant acceptance is market-priced, and India's selected UPI P2M payments above ₹2,000 gain a 0.4% fee from a post-Diwali date still to be notified with caps and exemptions. Operators need each rail's current fee and refund rules.

Why do different countries have different dominant payment methods?

Regulation, consumer adoption and distribution all shape which payment method dominates. India's 2020 UPI zero-MDR rule helped merchant adoption, but selected merchant payments gain a fee from a post-Diwali date still to be notified. Brazil's Pix has a different model: P2P is free while merchant pricing is market-based. Operators entering a market should identify the dominant rail and verify the current commercial and regulatory terms for their own use case.

How should an operator prioritise which payment methods to support in a new market?

Start with the payment methods relevant to your target customer segment and transaction type. Check acceptance, provider access, pricing, refunds and reconciliation for that use case. Use the market guide to plan coverage rather than assuming national adoption establishes the right mix for every merchant.

What does cross-border payment infrastructure actually look like for a merchant receiving international customers?

A merchant accepting international card payments is primarily using Visa or Mastercard's cross-border acquiring rules — the card scheme routes the transaction globally, the merchant's acquirer converts currency, and the issuer pays in the cardholder's home currency. For bank transfer payments (SWIFT), the payment travels through correspondent bank chains that add cost and delay. For digital wallets (Alipay, WeChat Pay), the operator typically needs a local aggregator licensed to settle cross-border wallet transactions. Distinguish bilateral real-time rail linkages such as UPI-PayNow from the multilateral Nexus framework. Verify the participants, provider, product and availability of any proposed corridor before relying on it as an alternative route.

What is Project Nexus and why does it matter for operators?

Project Nexus is a BIS Innovation Hub initiative designed to interconnect domestic instant payment systems through a multilateral framework, rather than a separate bilateral connection for every pair of systems. The bilateral UPI-PayNow connection and Nexus are distinct: an existing bilateral linkage does not establish that Nexus is operational on that corridor. Assess the available provider, participants and payment product for your intended route. For operators, Nexus matters because it is the emerging architecture for low-cost, real-time cross-border settlement — and it may eventually make SWIFT correspondent banking optional for retail payment corridors where Nexus has coverage.

UPI timing update (27 October 2026): NPCI’s 13 October notice deferred selected-merchant MDR until after Diwali, with the date to be notified separately. The prior 15 October start does not apply.

Global payments is a patchwork of national rails, regional schemes, and private networks. Real-time A2A networks like UPI, Pix, PayNow and PromptPay carry huge volume, but their merchant fees differ by rail and transaction category. India’s selected UPI merchant payments above ₹2,000 gain a 0.4% fee from a post-Diwali date still to be notified, subject to caps and exemptions. Cards remain widely accepted across markets; local-rail coverage and economics still matter for operators entering each market.

For operators, the practical implication is that payment localisation is not optional — it is the margin. A merchant entering India should assess UPI coverage against its target customers rather than assuming international-card acceptance is sufficient. A subscription business in Brazil should assess Pix Automático alongside cards, including customer adoption, mandate setup, payment recovery and reconciliation. The cross-border layer adds another dimension: SWIFT correspondent chains, FX timing risk, and memo truncation remain the default for B2B flows, while bilateral real-time linkages and stablecoin routes need corridor-specific checks of access, cost and recipient availability.

The briefings in this topic are the operator’s reference for understanding which rail matters in each market, what it costs to connect, and what regulatory forces will reshape the landscape over the next 12–24 months.