Skip to content
← All topics

Stablecoins

Separate holding, on-chain transfer, issuer redemption and fiat availability. Evaluate the complete route, its counterparties and its controls.

Browse all 15 articles ↓

Briefings, grouped by decision

15 briefings in Stablecoins

Issuer, treasury & infrastructure

Choosing which stablecoin to use, how to hold it safely, which chain to settle on, and how to read reserve reports before committing to an issuer.

Reference

Frequently asked

When does stablecoin settlement actually beat SWIFT for B2B cross-border?

Compare the same corridor, amount, currencies and required delivery outcome. Include funding, conversion spreads, network costs, custody, redemption and local payout. On-chain completion alone does not establish when the recipient can use fiat. The result depends on the particular bank and stablecoin routes available to your business.

What's the difference between USDC and USDT for business treasury use?

Evaluate each issuer and supported token on reserve disclosures, redemption eligibility, custody, chain support and the counterparties needed for your payment route. A dollar reference price does not establish equivalent issuer risk, redemption rights or regulatory treatment. Use the issuer comparison and reserve-report guides before selecting a holding.

What is the GENIUS Act and how does it change US stablecoin operations?

Use the dedicated GENIUS Act reference to distinguish the legislation, implementing rules and effective-date conditions. Check the particular issuer and service provider against the rules applicable to the activity. A law or framework announcement alone does not establish that a token is legal tender or that a provider is authorized.

How does MiCA affect EU stablecoin usage for non-EU operators?

Separate the issuer, token category, service provider and activity with an EU connection. Their regulatory requirements differ. Use the regulatory comparison to check the applicable authorization and service scope rather than treating a token ticker or a provider marketing claim as proof of compliance.

What are the operational challenges of running stablecoin treasury at scale?

Identify who controls the wallet, who can redeem the token and who delivers fiat. Plan access controls, key recovery, reconciliation, liquidity, provider failure and incident escalation. Review accounting, tax, screening and reporting requirements for the actual entities and jurisdictions; a single universal cost or retention assumption is insufficient.

A corridor comparison needs to follow the whole payment loop: fiat funding, conversion, token transfer, redemption and recipient payout. Compare actual provider quotes and delivery conditions for that route. A network fee or an on-chain confirmation time does not establish the total payment cost or when the recipient has usable fiat.

The US, EU and Singapore references separate issuer rules from the obligations of the operator and its service providers. Check effective dates, implementation conditions and authorization for the exact activity. Do not treat a published framework or approval for one service as permission for every stablecoin payment product.

For treasury operations, record wallet control, redemption access, provider exposure and reconciliation separately. The briefings cover corridor economics, issuer and reserve evaluation, custody and key management, and the regulatory checks needed before funding a route.